Board of Commissioner Races

Charlie Baugh lets you know what he thinks about the developer gang: Porter, Maxey, Luke, Norris and Davis. I would not recommend voting for any of this ethically challenged candidates.

Woven brightly,
Daniel J. Matthews, Jr.




Citizens
Following this message is a message from Lee Becker with a link to his blog .  He has just posted 3 articles with information that every voter should have before making a decision in the Board of Commission races.

Mike Maxey a grading contractor running against Chuck Horton for post 4 talks a lot about his ethics but I think  Maxey hasn't a clue what the word means for public officials.  Sitting on the Planning Commission, he voted to rezone property for a hotel being developed by Chairman Melvin Davis's campaign manager.   Later he took the contract to do the grading on the hotel project.  Not only that,  Maxey plans to vote on rezone applications and then seek the grading work on the projects.  At least he is up front about it.  If you vote for him you know what you will be getting.   Maxey has also stated that he thinks it takes too long to get property rezoned and he will seek to speed up the process.  How would you like to be in a neighborhood contesting a bad rezone application and be facing a board made up of Mr. Maxey, Don Norris who has seen few rezone requests he did not like and whose bank has the opportunity for more loans each time property is rezoned,  Jim Luke who operates hardware stores and profits from more building and Ester Porter,(should she defeat Margaret Hale) who sells building products?  All four could profit directly or indirectly from their votes.  Which do you think would take precedence, money or neighborhood protection?  We need to keep a balanced board.

Speaking of neighborhood protection,  how would you like to have an industrial rezone for a garbage transfer station dropped next to your neighborhood?  That was proposed 2 years ago and Mike Maxey voted for it.  Fortunately it was not approved by the Board of Commissioners thanks to Chuck Horton and Margaret Hale.  The rezone applicant subsequently sued the county but withdrew the suit.  That party is now a major backer of Maxey.  There are several other instances where Maxey voted for rezones that were not in the best interest of nearby neighborhoods.  Maxey is campaigning on republican principles.  These are not the republican principles that I  vote for.

Melvin Davis, Don Norris and Jim Luke blather about wise spending and keeping taxes low.  I call it blather because there is so much difference in what they say and what they do.  They voted to commit the county to a $345,000,000 reservoir project in Walton County.  The Oconee portion is about $100,000,000 plus debt service and could be the entire project if Walton is unable to pay its part.  Although the promise was made that water customers would pay for it the only funds committed are property taxes.  Commissioners Horton and Hale voted against that project.  They wanted our money spent in this county.  Has anyone had a tax decrease in the past 4 years?  Just compare your tax bill of 4 years ago to your 2007 bill. 

I encourage you to go to Lee's blog and read his latest posts.  He also has an archive of all his posts which should be helpful  to voters.g
Charles Baugh




Dear Friends, 
 
  I've just posted two reports on my blog, one covering the recently filed > Campaign Contribution Disclosure Reports for the Oconee County Board of > Commissioners races and the other listing sources of information about the > campaigns. 
 
  The first report shows the dominance of incumbents in raising and and > spending money. The exception is challenger Mike Maxey, who has loaned his > campaign a significant sum and spent heavily on advertising. Incumbent BOC > Chairman Melvin Davis has raised the most money, spent the most money, and > has the most available to spend. 

  The second report gives links to printed reports and audio and video files > relating to the campaign. 
 
  Go to http://www.oconeecountyobservations.blogspot.com/ for the two blogs > filed today. 
 
  Lee 

Comments

Anonymous said…
It appears that some of this bunch will do whatever they can to discredit Mr. Maxey. Looks like it may be a little too late. I think he is going to win and I think you guys know it. His roots are too deep and he has actually has done something for the community and not just for himself like his opponent. It will be interesting to see when Mr. Maxey wins how this group will try to mend the fences and work with him after all of this is over.
I do not condemn Mr. Maxey for running for office. I do not share your confidence in his ability to govern and believe his flip-flops on his choices for which office to run for and whether or not he would involve himself in the work on the Veterans Monument and the his lack of understanding when he should recuse himself from apparent conflicts of interest demonstrate a distinct lack of public service skills.
Anonymous said…
Only time will tell. I understand that a Phase 2 in order at the Memorial and lets see if he steps up to help with it also. I am pretty sure he will.
I think he is the better candidate and not just another politician.
I will grant you this much, should Maxey win, I hope he continues his no nonsense, straight shooter approach to all his projects, and I appreciate your candor, opinion and input. Have you voted yet? I do see more Maxey signs and billboards and what not. I think Maxey has a real chance of winning but have heard that some of the members of his own family are not even voting for him. I would again point to this as a vote of no confidence from someone who knows him much better than I do.

Popular posts from this blog

Jeff Dantzler's arrests may be the best thing that ever happened to him

A deep wound waiting to be healed - restoring order and dignity in the city cemetery

Don't dissolve North High Shoals