Trans Oconee Republic

Even though Elijah Clarke's short lived independent state of 1794 did not include modern day Oconee County, it is always an interesting look back at our history. There is a talk tonight by Steve Scurry at Cine' that might touch on this:

Steve Scurry is giving a presentation this Sunday, April 27, called
"Defending the Beloved Land." He will be reporting on his latest
findings about the Oconee War, a little known conflict between the
Creek Nation and early White settlers that occurred in Georgia in the
late 1700s. The presentation will be held at Athens Cine from 6-9pm.
Suggested donation is $3.

More info:

Steve's articles in the Flagpole:
http://flagpole.com/News/Features/OconeeWar/2004-04-07
http://flagpole.com/News/Features/OconeeWar/2004-04-21
http://flagpole.com/News/Features/OconeeWar/2004-04-28
http://flagpole.com/News/Features/StevenScurry/2007-04-18
http://flagpole.com/News/Features/MermaidsAndAlligators/2008-03-05
http://flagpole.com/News/Features/MermaidsAndAlligators/2008-03-05

Here is more from the New Georgia Encyclopedia about the Trans Oconee Republic:

Trans-Oconee Republic

"Trans-Oconee Republic" is the name used by later historians to describe the short-lived independent state established by Elijah Clarke west of the Oconee River in 1794. While occupying areas in present-day portions of Greene, Morgan, Putnam, and Baldwin counties, Clarke and his followers erected as many as six fortified settlements, wrote a constitution, and elected their own officials. But after a few months, pressure from the federal government forced the governor to take action, and Clarke's independent state came to an end.

Like most Georgians at the time, Clarke wanted the hunting lands of the Creek Indians beyond the river to be opened for settlement as quickly as possible. The 1790 Treaty of New York, however, limited Georgia's westward expansion indefinitely and returned to the Creeks some land gained by the state in an earlier cession. According to the treaty provisions, the Creeks were responsible for expelling or punishing intruders as they saw fit. Clarke believed that those settlers whom the Indians were unwilling or unable to expel should be able to settle west of the river.

In
Courtesy of Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Georgia Libraries
Elijah Clarke
February 1794 Clarke resigned from the Georgia militia after two decades of distinguished service. Around that same time he received a French commission as a major general and began recruiting soldiers for an attack on Spanish Florida. The invasion never materialized, and he decided to use the remnants of his army to seize Indian lands west of the Oconee in May of that year. The Creeks did not resist, and the independent state quickly took shape. With promises of land to those who would join the venture, Clarke hoped to fill Creek lands with settlers before the state and federal government had time to react. Many Georgians were skeptical of his dubious plan, and no more than a few hundred crossed the river.

U.S. president George Washington believed that Clarke's scheme was detrimental to relations with both the Indians and the Spanish. In accordance with Washington's policy of neutrality, his administration pressured Governor George Mathews to put an end to the affair and threatened federal military intervention otherwise. To keep the federal government out of what he considered to be a state issue, Mathews issued a proclamation in July officially condemning Clarke and his adventurers. Certain of his innocence, Clarke voluntarily surrendered to authorities in Wilkes County. Four sympathetic justices of the peace released him, and he promptly returned across the river to continue his plan.

Recognizing Clarke's popularity, Mathews hesitated to take further action against him. Furthermore,
Courtesy of Hargrett Rare Book and Manuscript Library, University of Georgia Libraries
George Walton
restoring valuable land to the Creeks, who were despised by many Georgians, would not be received favorably. After a month of indecision, the governor was spurred into action by the "spirited exertions" of Judge George Walton, one of Georgia's signers of the Declaration of Independence and a staunch Federalist. In his charge to an Augusta grand jury, Walton carefully explained why Clarke's actions were in violation of both state and federal laws. Allowing Clarke's settlements to continue, Walton argued, would disrupt the stability of the new federal government and set a dangerous precedent. If Clarke could occupy "the richest jewel the state of Georgia possesses" before the lands were legally opened, then nothing would prevent others from doing the same, and federal treaties would be worthless.

With Walton's eloquence and reputation on his side, Governor Mathews felt confident enough to send the militia against the illegal settlements. As 1,200 militiamen under Generals Jared Irwin and John Twiggs marched to the Oconee in late September 1794, Clarke vowed to defend his independent state with his life. However, when Irwin offered full amnesty to those who would peacefully return east of the river, Clarke and virtually all of his men surrendered and went back to their homes. Mathews wrote to the secretary of war in October, declaring that "the whole business happily terminated without the loss of blood." Thus Georgia peacefully ended a tense standoff and avoided a clash with the federal government.

Suggested Reading

Edwin Bridges, "To Establish a Separate and Independent Government," Furman Review 5 (1974): 11-17.

Louise Frederick Hays, Hero of Hornet's Nest: A Biography of Elijah Clark, 1733 to 1799 (New York: Stratford House, 1946).

Richard K. Murdoch, The Georgia-Florida Frontier, 1793-1796: Spanish Reaction to French Intrigue and American Designs (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951).

Christopher J. Floyd, Georgia College and State University

Published 8/26/2005

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jeff Dantzler's arrests may be the best thing that ever happened to him

A deep wound waiting to be healed - restoring order and dignity in the city cemetery

I strongly disagree with the impending demolishing of the iconic Watkinsville Water Tower